Comments on: Possible changes to modelling of hollow spar buoys http://www.orcina.com/blog/possible-changes-to-modelling-of-hollow-spar-buoys/ Orcina Ltd. discussing all things OrcaFlex Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:52:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: David Heffernan http://www.orcina.com/blog/possible-changes-to-modelling-of-hollow-spar-buoys/comment-page-1/#comment-75 David Heffernan Tue, 04 May 2010 00:00:15 +0000 http://www.orcina.com/blog/possible-changes-to-modelling-of-hollow-spar-buoys/#comment-75 @Phil Thanks a lot for your comments. I think we will get around to doing this, but perhaps not in 9.4! @Phil

Thanks a lot for your comments. I think we will get around to doing this, but perhaps not in 9.4!

]]> By: Phil Pedlow http://www.orcina.com/blog/possible-changes-to-modelling-of-hollow-spar-buoys/comment-page-1/#comment-74 Phil Pedlow Mon, 03 May 2010 05:33:52 +0000 http://www.orcina.com/blog/possible-changes-to-modelling-of-hollow-spar-buoys/#comment-74 I've only just come across this on the blog after looking at your UGM 2009 presentations. Seems like a good idea and a reasonably intuitive way to model the situation to me. In conjunction with other modelling improvements (slamming, radiation damping at surface, suction effects at seabed) I can see this being very useful. I’ve only just come across this on the blog after looking at your UGM 2009 presentations. Seems like a good idea and a reasonably intuitive way to model the situation to me. In conjunction with other modelling improvements (slamming, radiation damping at surface, suction effects at seabed) I can see this being very useful.

]]>